In-Hand Images: McFarlane Toys DC Multiverse Aztek (Red Platinum) Figure

by toynewman
May 6, 2026
Shown below via robdtoys is a look at the new DC Multiverse Aztek (Red Platinum) Figure from McFarlane Toys.
Image 1 of 9
1 of 9
Image 2 of 9
2 of 9
Image 3 of 9
3 of 9
Image 4 of 9
4 of 9
Image 5 of 9
5 of 9
Image 6 of 9
6 of 9
Image 7 of 9
7 of 9
Image 8 of 9
8 of 9
Image 9 of 9
9 of 9


Comments...

Last 10 comments - ( Read All Posts )
Admiralty_Entertainment - 2026-05-12 @ 11:16 pm
On 5/11/2026 at 9:30 AM, rono said:

So many missing characters that are just left out of the line. It makes no sense.

Guy Gardner, Hawkgirl and Engineer from Superman (2025) just to add a few more in in the astoundingly absent characters...

Lord_Scareglow - 2026-05-11 @ 8:49 pm
5 hours ago, Maximoffed said:

I think we can now safely say that McFarlame SPAWNS Batman figures.

Thought, hey Todd why don't you just make the figure we all know you want to, Batspawn, and you can do 17 variants, and when that well runs dry, just switch it up and bit and do Al Wayne, oh yeah not done...Bruce Simmons, I mean come on...The Joker/Clown combination seems way too perfect.

RobertD - 2026-05-11 @ 5:49 pm
6 hours ago, deecee4 said:

The DKR bat symbol looks off....i feel like I pointed that out before but saying it again i guess lol.

The yellow-backed symbol in DKR is notably inconsistent throughout the first two issues, even in-sequence it gets drawn differently. That said, I don't think the symbol McFarlane is using here gets drawn once. (the second pic I've provided is the closest thing, but even that's more elongated that what McFarlane has done). In nearly every panel we see it, the Batsymbol (that he actually wears) has the far-end up-and-down points, as opposed to the umbrella look on this figure. There's a dozen versions they could have done that would have been more accurate than this, is what I'm saying.

LB3Shops - 2026-05-11 @ 4:00 pm
22 hours ago, Steven3 said:

I completely agree with youwe shouldn't have such high expectations for Mattel, because the disappointment will only be greater. I want it to be good too, but I have my doubts; Im not at all sure itll be much better than McFarlanes. (It might just be bad in a different way.) Id be happy if McFarlane stayed onthey just need to pay a little more attention to quality, and everything would be fine.

This Daredevil-style red Batman is pretty cool, but I still don't get why some figures have wires in their capes and others don't. The latest Green Lantern (the one with Grundy) didn't have any, even though his collar and cape look exactly the same. (Just like Bloodwynd's.)

Precisely the approach one should take. When Mattel had DC before, all of their figures had the same 3 or 4 body types in small, mid, to large height/build. Same abs, same body frames, same articulation, etc. They've stepped up their game with all of their "Ultimate" wwe figs. But they are pretty much just McFarlane figs. To see the future of DC, look no further than w/e Mattel considers their best figures now. If they go the newer "He-Man" route, things should be fine. Not amazing, but fine.

20 hours ago, rono said:

I don't think McFarlane is anti-customer, but I do find that the lack of core figures of major legacy villains to be a true head scratcher since he's had the DC license for over 5+ years. No comics' based Poison Ivy, Black Mask, Ventriloquist w/Scarface, Mad Hatter, Harley Quinn, modern era Catwoman, & Penguin, yet we get Mr. Bloom? No Theatrical Ra's al Ghul from Batman Begins? No Mad Hatter from Batman '66, but they produce the pink cowled Batman from one of the Batman '66 episodes featuring the Mad Hatter. Ridiculous.

So many missing characters that are just left out of the line. It makes no sense.

Now THIS I absolutely agree with! He should do a wave of JUST these figs you mentioned alone. Mostly the modern comics Batman rogues.

Maximoffed - 2026-05-11 @ 3:27 pm
12 hours ago, Lord_Scareglow said:

i Just got shot in the face with a Batman cannon . . . this guy literally spews batman figures out of a slurpy machine joke like too real to be funny.

I think we can now safely say that McFarlame SPAWNS Batman figures.

toynewman - 2026-05-11 @ 3:11 pm
50 minutes ago, obs said:

Its the correct color now. I have a feeling the first one was an error that couldnt be fixed and the black one was a standard repaint although ill bet a black version exists in some source material somewhere. This 3rd one is what was meant to come out originally. The next version of the Az-bat armor was more in line with this darker blue which is correct. That original release was also hard as hell to find. Even for me.

Id like the first version of the standard Batman suit with the crazy gauntlets. Thats an easy custom if the gsuntlets are the same across both versions.

If only one of those four awful figures was actually the original 1996 Sword of Azrael Costume....

obs - 2026-05-11 @ 2:20 pm
18 hours ago, Steven3 said:

This Azrael Batman Armor has been released quite a few times alreadyso whats different about this one, aside from the metallic paint job?

Its the correct color now. I have a feeling the first one was an error that couldnt be fixed and the black one was a standard repaint although ill bet a black version exists in some source material somewhere. This 3rd one is what was meant to come out originally. The next version of the Az-bat armor was more in line with this darker blue which is correct. That original release was also hard as hell to find. Even for me.

Id like the first version of the standard Batman suit with the crazy gauntlets. Thats an easy custom if the gsuntlets are the same across both versions.

deecee4 - 2026-05-11 @ 11:00 am

The DKR bat symbol looks off....i feel like I pointed that out before but saying it again i guess lol.

Lord_Scareglow - 2026-05-11 @ 2:31 am

i Just got shot in the face with a Batman cannon, like caaamm on, dude, what kinda coffee are you drinking in the morning, at this point there is no way he's making Batman money from all these Batman, it must be the opposite like I need the numbers crunched and the pie charts, because I can't....it actually makes me boil and at the same time laugh at how predictable it is, making the this guy literally spews batman figures out of a slurpy machine joke like too real to be funny.

I should play the how many Batmen is Todd gonna make this month lottery, I might win enough to buy McFarlane toys off of him, So I can make 55 Dumb Bunny figures before the licenses ends.

rono - 2026-05-10 @ 9:30 pm

I don't think McFarlane is anti-customer, but I do find that the lack of core figures of major legacy villains to be a true head scratcher since he's had the DC license for over 5+ years. No comics' based Poison Ivy, Black Mask, Ventriloquist w/Scarface, Mad Hatter, Harley Quinn, modern era Catwoman, & Penguin, yet we get Mr. Bloom? No Theatrical Ra's al Ghul from Batman Begins? No Mad Hatter from Batman '66, but they produce the pink cowled Batman from one of the Batman '66 episodes featuring the Mad Hatter. Ridiculous.

So many missing characters that are just left out of the line. It makes no sense.

Post Your Comment Now! (membership required)


FIGURES SHOPPING ONLINE

Advertise on ToyNewsi.com

Search Online Stores for McFarlane Toys DC Multiverse

Shopping links on this site may generate revenue when a purchase is made.
Toys Shopping Oniine


More



Advertise on ToyNewsi.com



REVIEWS

Toy Photography

Entertainment

Customs

This site uses cookies for site configuration, advertising, and analysis. By using this site you accept our policies - Read Full Site Policy OK
Sign Up For The TNI Newsletter And Have The News Delivered To You!
SOCIAL NETWORKS

ToyNewsI MarvelousNews Tformers JediInsider
Entertainment News International (ENI) is the oldest, largest, and most popular news source for adult toy collectors (kidults) all around the world.

Get the scoop every day on all the popular culture action figures, comics, games, movies, toys, and more!

Contact and Support
Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy


All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Please Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE