Overall I do like this figure but IMO the 'Signiture Series' Penquin turned out better here. The proportions on Joker look a little off, the head could've been sculpted better, not a terrible figure mind you and will be getting one, just a few observations.
The body sculpt looks great but the head looks really off, if the head would have been more proportionate and the hair would have been sculpted better this figure would have been much better.
5 hours ago, RyanJSaber said:So happy I dont need to pay 80$ for the mafex
That's understandable if its not really that important character for you or you just dont feel the need for a greater looking HL joker, I have the mafex 2.0 Joker and its an absolute beauty (like any figure its not perfect but itsas close to perfect as that particular figurecould be) I wouldnt change it for this figure and Im glad I payed close to $80 for it because when I got the figure I thought it was worth it, but to each his own.I personaly would rather pay morefor a figure and feel every dolar I payed for itwas worth it than pay close to $30 and feel like I threw if not all, then part of the money I spent on that figure down the toilet.Still for people who dont care to spend as much as a Mafex one this looks better than the previous Mattel Movie Masters figures (just look well when you buy it to minimize QC issues since Mattel is known to be pretty bad with that as of late)
3 hours ago, RyanJSaber said:So happy I dont need to pay 80$ for the mafex
While I believe the Mafex figure is the superior figure, this is still a good figure for only $25-$28. But for $80 whatever figure it is should always be the superior figure lol
So happy I dont need to pay 80$ for the mafex
4 hours ago, Satam said:The submachine gun is a Smith & Wesson M76. It kinda looks like something from WWII, but it's Vietnam era. Shame yours was so bent up out of the package. I hate that.
Thanks for the info.
The submachine gun is a Smith & Wesson M76. It kinda looks like something from WWII, but it's Vietnam era. Shame yours was so bent up out of the package. I hate that.
2 hours ago, SpiderS said:Great review, Main issue with this figure is either oversized head or undersized torso and skinny arms, I get the idea they didn't want figure to be too baggy but they overdid it.
I agree with you. From a distance it looks good, but up close its too thin
Great review, Main issue with this figure is either oversized head or undersized torso and skinny arms, I get the idea they didn't want figure to be too baggy but they overdid it.
Entertainment News International (ENI) is the #1 popular culture network for adult fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!
Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy
©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE