On 4/9/2025 at 11:19 AM, Homersteam said:Those proportions on this Batman are very odd. He has a big person's long legs, a smaller person's torso, and short arms.
Yeah he's got some thick thighs, it's a bit odd, but That's Todd for yeah. But even though it's odd, I actually kinda like this figure and would get it, I'm still trying to find a Favorite Batman...but it doesn't seem to happen, either it's awesome but impossible to find, or it sucks and it's so easy to find.... I can't win on a Batman, but this one is maybe...in the middle enough that I can get it, or I'll just wait and see what Mattel can offer.
17 hours ago, toynewman said:
Sculpt wise it solid enough but I was thinking what was wrong and realized it's that shiny plastic look that really harms the look of the figure, Year one was a really flat colored comic book, so they really should have found a way to give this figure flat grey.
I would've picked this up if it was done on the nightfall body.
Weirdly enough, I actually quite like this. Wouldn't say no if it happened to fall into my grasp locally, but not going to break my neck to try and acquire.
Yes it's DC REBIRTH BATMAN only a bit rebuilt, not too bad after all, but I already have the Batman with Bat-Glider (The Thirteenth Hour) Gold Label, that's enough.
Super generic looking. I'm good. Gordon on the other hand...
This looks like a nice figure but the last thing I ever need is yet another Batman.
11 minutes ago, Homersteam said:Those proportions on this Batman are very odd. He has a big person's long legs, a smaller person's torso, and short arms.
McFarlane figures NEVER have odd proportions . . . .
Those proportions on this Batman are very odd. He has a big person's long legs, a smaller person's torso, and short arms.
__scaled_800.jpg)
__scaled_800.jpg)
