I think one of its main problems is it just looks...ugly and uninteresting.
Harley Quinn is dressed like an idiot. WHAT IS THAT OUTFIT EVEN SUPPOSED TO BE? She looks like a Stripper/Plumber from the Mad Max universe. I look at her outfit and I see plumber's overalls.
It's further hurt by a lack of any characters that we care about. Now, granted, fans of the Batman comics (and DC comics in general) will recognize most of these characters, particularly Huntress and Black Canary. The thing is, these characters don't resemble their comic counterparts at all, and they certainly aren't wearing any interesting costumes, much less costumes that even SLIGHTLY resemble their comic outfits.
So to a casual viewer you have this : Harley Quinn and a bunch of boring normal people are fighting against some evil boring normal people. That's what the trailer showed us anyway. No cool looking super powered characters to be found in the trailer or promotional material.
The studio thought Harley could carry a movie on her own like Deadpool did, because those two characters are pretty neck and neck in terms of popularity amongst comic fans. The difference is, the Deadpool movies did Deadpool RIGHT. He was portrayed as he is in the comics. In both character AND appearance.
Harley? Not so much.
On 2/10/2020 at 6:47 PM, Satam said:Apparently, WB is renaming the movie "Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey."https://bloody-disgusting.com/comics/3604284/harley-quinn-birds-prey-warner-bros-quickly-retitles-film-weak-box-office-opening/Problem solved. Now it'll make BILLIONS!
that only proves DC doesn't know what they are doing
Apparently, WB is renaming the movie "Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey."https://bloody-disgusting.com/comics/3604284/harley-quinn-birds-prey-warner-bros-quickly-retitles-film-weak-box-office-opening/Problem solved. Now it'll make BILLIONS!
And there you have it folks, Birds of Prey never had a prayer, they came, they crashed, they burned. Game over. Tough break DC.
I'm in the camp of rarely going to the movies anymore, not really interested in a lot of stuff out there. As for this movie, never really had any interest in it, I wasn't a fan of Suicide Squad and I don't care for Harley Quinn and Margot Robbie's portrayal of her. The trailers all looked pretty underwhelming and although I'm a fan of Ewan McGregor, I don't think he's enough of a reason to go see this movie. The drawing point here should have been the Birds of Prey but most of the marketing for this movie made it seem like they were back up singers for Harley Quinn, plus they are barely recognizable. When making a movie based on a comic book you have to strike a balance where the movie can appeal to both comic book fans and casual audiences. I feel that the costumes from this movie could have been better, especially when you consider the fact that is one area where WB/DC had great success in their recent movies. Most reviews I have read have been positive but I didn't read anything in those reviews that made change my mind about it. Perhaps positive word of mouth will turn things around for this movie financially but I doubt it.
5 hours ago, Flounnderr said:Well honestly, I don't think it has anything to do with people in general not wanting to go to theaters because of pricing and snacks. Clearly people are seeing movies still despite this.
Why did this movie fail?
1) Nobody was really in their costumes (it didn't look like a superhero movie)
2) didn't follow any real relation to the comics (of which that's a main market for getting fan butts in the seats)
3) mainly a female cast that seems to be pitched only to a female market (be smart and cast a wider appeal; both Captain Marvel and Wonder Woman had men in the supporting cast)
I think DC tried to make this a "Deadpool" and I think it would've worked if it was just a Harley movie and had a smaller cast. Also, I think the studio relied on the popularity of the character for comic fans and played only to newcomer viewers and assumed comic fans would see it regardless of what they put up on screen.
Yep I have no interest in seeing it at all because of #1 & #2
Once again I assume Harley is the only one in character! Black Mask might be too. However the rest of the cast don't seem to be at all.
The wife and I are extremely choosy about what movies we go see in theaters, probably much more than we used to be. Unless someone else is paying, we don't go to see movies that we aren't already sure we're going to like. And even then it has to be something that looks epic like 1917 or Endgame.
2 hours ago, JayC said:Actually the overall box office is down, people aren't going to movies as much as they once did.
11 minutes ago, Flounnderr said:Well honestly, I don't think it has anything to do with people in general not wanting to go to theaters because of pricing and snacks. Clearly people are seeing movies still despite this.
Actually the overall box office is down, people aren't going to movies as much as they once did.
Well honestly, I don't think it has anything to do with people in general not wanting to go to theaters because of pricing and snacks. Clearly people are seeing movies still despite this.
Why did this movie fail?
1) Nobody was really in their costumes (it didn't look like a superhero movie)
2) didn't follow any real relation to the comics (of which that's a main market for getting fan butts in the seats)
3) mainly a female cast that seems to be pitched only to a female market (be smart and cast a wider appeal; both Captain Marvel and Wonder Woman had men in the supporting cast)
I think DC tried to make this a "Deadpool" and I think it would've worked if it was just a Harley movie and had a smaller cast. Also, I think the studio relied on the popularity of the character for comic fans and played only to newcomer viewers and assumed comic fans would see it regardless of what they put up on screen.
I personally have no interest in this movie. If they'd made a movie where the Birds of Prey actually hunted Harley and Poison Ivy, I'd be far more interested.